The Blue end of Manchester has undergone severe changes in
form and authority. The Sheikh has brought loads of talent to the less popular
of the Stadiums of Manchester. Okay, he has done it with plenty of Oil money,
but he still has the funds, and he sure as hell knows to spend it well. He has
brought some immense talent to the Premier League. Be it Silva, or Aguero, or
Balotelli; the talent bought is unpalatable Sheikh Mansoor has resurrected a
lesser known half of Manchester and has brought the Battle of Manchester to a
fair ground.
I am a
Manc, and I have often seen people hurling derogatory remarks at the Blue end.
I too have been in this lot of people. But later I realised my mistake. I had
no reason to hate them, other than them being our rivals. But hating them for
buying players? Aren't we being the supreme hypocrites when we say this? I
know, many of you would disagree with me but ask yourself one question. Ask
yourself about the reason to hate City?
What
wrong have they done? If bringing quality players to your squad is a crime,
then Every manager would love to be a criminal. Mancini had the funds and he
moved on with his plans. If any manager knows that he'll be backed by HUGE(read
infinite) funds, he can go berserk in the transfer window and still manage to
make some decent signings. They have definitely added to the pressure in the
already Inflation hit transfer market. Any team now has to make sure that they not only have to make a decent
enough bid to sign a player but also make sure that they bid a considerably
high amount so that City don't hijack the bid. It has all come down to the
primary theory of Charles Darwin, "Survival of the fittest."
So,
competition is always considered healthy for any field. And Sports is any
different from it. But Pundits too have often criticised Man City for their
aggressive approach to transfers. When asked, everyone say that it isn't
"FAIR". Who will decide what's fair and what's not? You, me, Pundits
or the UEFA? The Fair Play rule inducted by the UEFA has been under the scanner
for a long time and time and again flaws have been discovered in it. So,
Spending Money is definitely NOT A CRIME.
Manchester City are a club who have risen from the annals of anonymity to the pinnacle of success in a very short span of time. They have bought
players, vigorously, and have taken their squad to new heights as the players
have added flair to the the squad and to the League in a whole. The new players
have brought a much wanted flair and spark. Silva has taken the passing skills
in the League to a all new height. Aguero has added the goal scoring intent to
the Blue end of Manchester.
The
critics still chose to condemn Manchester City because of their antics in the
transfer window. But have you ever asked this question to yourself - "Why
Do I hate City so much?"
You will
definitely find yourself reeling over this question. Unless you hate them just
for being the rival club of your favourite team, you definitely lack the true
reason to hate City. Then why do we see so many fans and pundits go all guns
blazing on the new and rising team of the toughest league in the world. We
criticise them for being a real force in the transfer market and for playing "Boring"(read
passing-style) football. But aren't we forgetting that these two styles are
used by the Spanish giants Real Madrid and Barcelona over the years. So,
indirectly we are hating Manchester City for Emulating the perfect of amalgamation of the Spanish giants.
Real
Madrid have been bolstering their squad time and again. But no one has
questioned their tactics. In the face of "Galacticos", they crooked
all the "fair-play" and brought together one of the costliest team.
They bought he best talents in Europe to overshadow their Catalunyan Opponents.
Beckham, Zidane, Ronaldo, Roberto Carlos and many others came together to form
a team to reckon with. Did we question them? Where was UEFA at that point of
time? No one stepped up and stop them. Were they afraid of the monetary
backdrop of the Galacticos? Even Barcelona are the second most spending team in
Europe in the past decade. They buy a new striker every transfer season
religiously. They have the best youth academy in the world but they still spend
big, No one can deny that fact. Why haven't UEFA ever questioned these Two
Giants of world football?
Some
critics have often questioned the slow tempo of the playing style of the League
Leaders. They pass the ball too often amongst themselves and then kill the
tempo, English League is reknowned for. In Spain, this style of football is
known as "tiki-taka". Pass the opponents to death and Bore the
viewers to death. But still people find Barcelona's style of play "intriguing",
"beautiful" and "stylish" whereas City are branded to play
"boring" and "slow" football. Talk about double standards,
eh?
I guess
the whole City team should wear the world-reknowned T-shirt of "Why Always
Us?" Why are we targeting the new force in the league? Are We afraid of
competition? We shouldn't dig too deep to criticise the Blue Side of
Manchester. Let's embrace the change in the new ball game and accept the new
challenge. Remember, To Beat the Best, you will have to Beat the Best. Let's
see whether the Rise of the Blue Moon is good enough to last some time or is it
just a temporary run of the mill.
No comments:
Post a Comment